Muslims don’t see themselves as British.

Most Muslims in Britain have no loyalty to the UK. They act like a clan the Nigerians today who killed a soldier only sees his loyalty with other Muslims. You can look at Muslim grooming gangs in the UK – they only groom none Muslim girls otherwise their communities would disown them. Muslim community’s don’t disown paedophiles who abuse none Muslim girls. Even the mothers of these Pakistani Muslim paedophiles blame the white girls for having sex when they are ten years old. They don’t condemn their sons for getting them hooked on hard drugs and selling the girls like pieces of meat.

How many more Muslims will be convicted of grooming crimes the number is over a hundred so far.

see http://www.xymalf.co.uk

The UK has given asylum to terrorists, war criminals, murderers and rapists and those who have done female genital mutilation. Are we so surprised of what is happening to our land?

If you emigrate to America you need to visit the American embassy – why are we letting in so many people without visas, who have passed through safe lands. These Muslims hate the western way of life but are happy taking our welfare benefits, using our hospitals and using the infidels gadgets like mobile phones. Muslims don’t want to integrate but create slums in the UK where English people can’t go for a swim without covering up and pubs are closed down and converted into Mosques. If Muslims desire Sharia so much why don’t they piss off and live in Saudi Arabia.

Advertisements

More Paedostanis

Seven members of a sex grooming ring have been convicted of abusing children from Oxford.

An Old Bailey jury heard six girls were drugged and suffered sadistic abuse while aged between 11 and 15.

The court heard victims were plied with alcohol and drugs before being forced to perform sex acts. Some had also been beaten, burned and threatened.

Eight men had denied charges including rape, arranging child prostitution and trafficking between 2004 to 2012.

The judge told the guilty men: “You have been convicted of the most serious offences and long custodial sentences are inevitable.”

They are due to be sentenced on 26 June 2013.

The court heard that girls were tied up, burnt, suffocated, bitten, scratched and urinated upon.

Most of the victims chose to take vast quantities of hard drugs to deaden their senses, particularly when they knew they were being hired out to a large group of men for gang abuse sessions that could go on for days.

The victims would return to Oxford bleeding, injured and carrying sexually-transmitted diseases.

One of the victims described being plied with hard drugs and forced to have sex with strangers while being filmed at the age of 13.

On one occasion she was given so much crack cocaine she could not breathe and was rushed to hospital.
Another, who was groomed at the age of 11, said she fell in love with Mohammed Karrar who raped her, beat her with a baseball bat and forced her to have an illegal back-room abortion when she was 12-years-old.

She said of her abuse: “At the time I thought it was my choice and it was fine, but years on I can see I never had a choice. I said ‘no’ but I didn’t have a say.

“It was literally like a normal relationship but I know now it isn’t a normal relationship. I was a child.

“He told me he loved me. He said he would take me to Saudi Arabia when I was 15 and marry me. I believed him at the time.”
The jury at the Old Bailey considered the evidence for two-and-a-half days and returned the following verdicts.

Kamar Jamil was found guilty of five counts of rape, two counts of conspiracy to rape and one count of facilitating child prostitution.
Akhtar Dogar was found guilty of five counts of rape, three counts of conspiracy to rape, two counts of child prostitution and one count of trafficking.
Anjum Dogar was found guilty of four counts of rape, guilty of two counts of child prostitution, two conspiracy to rape and one count of trafficking
Assad Hussain was found not guilty of rape and guilty of two counts of sex with a child.
Mohammed Karrar was found guilty of two counts of conspiracy to rape, three counts of rape of a child, one count of using an instrument to procure miscarriage, two counts of trafficking, one count of assault of a child by penetration, one count of child prostitution, one count of rape and one count of supplying a class A drug.
Bassam Karrar – was found guilty of two counts of rape, one count of conspiracy to rape a child, one count of rape of a child, one count of child prostitution, one count of trafficking and one count of conspiracy to rape
Zeeshan Ahmed – was found guilty of two counts of sex with a child.
Mohammed Hussain – was found not guilty of three counts of sex with a child.

There was a scuffle in the dock as Ahmed struck out at Mohammed Hussain when he was cleared of the charges against him.
The Old Bailey was told the key members of the group used and abused the six victims in a systematic and organised sex trafficking ring over eight years until their arrest in 2012.

Cost of EU Membership

Direct and Indirect Costs of the EU

Estimates of the true cost of the EU are difficult to come by. MPs have called many times for a cost-benefit analysis, to prove or disprove the benefits of membership. Successive Governments, both Labour and Conservative, have refused, on the grounds that the “benefits” are self-evident. In truth they are afraid of what such a study would show. The Bruges Group finally produced an authoritative study in 2008.

The total gross cost to the UK of EU membership in 2008 they estimate at around £65,000,000,000* – including:

£28 billion for business to comply with EU regulations,

£17 billion of additional food costs resulting from the Common Agricultural Policy

£3.3 billion – the value of the catch lost when the Common Fisheries Policy let other countries fish in our territorial waters

£14.6 billion gross paid into the EU budget and other EU funds. (In 2011 this had risen to £19 billion)

It gets worse each year. Used better, this sum could transform the UK – increase pensions, recruit more doctors, nurses, teachers and police, build advanced transport systems and start paying off the national debt.
U.K. has run the biggest trade deficits with Norway, Germany, China, Hong Kong and Netherlands. The biggest trade surpluses were recorded with United States, United Arab Emirates, Australia and Saudi Arabia.
Therefore Germany needs us more than we need them.

The Southern Border: Our Welcome Mat for Terrorists USA

The Southern Border: Our Welcome Mat for Terrorists
We regularly intercept large numbers of individuals from terrorist-sponsoring nations.
By Deroy Murdock

There are at least 7,518 reasons to get the U.S./Mexican border under control. That equals the number of aliens apprehended in fiscal year 2011 from the four nations the U.S. government labels “state sponsors of terrorism” and ten additional “countries of interest.” Since January 2010, those flying into America via these 14 nations face enhanced screening; as the Transportation Security Administration announced, “Effective aviation security must begin beyond our borders.” U.S. national security merits at least that much vigilance on our borders.

The roaring immigration-reform debate this year largely addresses Hispanic aliens who illegally cross the border. Far more worrisome, however, are the thousands who break into America from countries “where we have concerns, particularly about al-Qaeda affiliates,” a top State Department official told CNN.

These include Cubans, Iranians, Sudanese, and Syrians whose governments are federally designated “state sponsors of terrorism.” As indicated by the latest information in Table 34 of Customs and Border Protection’s Immigration Yearbook 2011, 198 Sudanese were nabbed while penetrating the USA. Between FY 2002 and 2011, there were 1,207 such arrests. (These figures cover all U.S. borders, although, as Table 35 confirms, 96.3 percent of detainees overall crossed from Mexico.) Like other immigrants, most Sudanese seek better lives here. But some may be vectors for the same militant Islam that literally tore Sudan in two.

In FY 2011, 108 Syrians were stopped at our borders; over ten years, the number is 1,353. Syria is a key supporter of Hezbollah, and Bashar Assad’s unstable regime reportedly has attacked its domestic opponents with chemical weapons.

As for Iranians, 276 were caught in FY 2011, while 2,310 were captured over the previous ten years. Iran also backs Hezbollah, hates “the Great Satan,” and craves atomic weapons.

The other ten “countries of interest” are Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Yemen, and:

Afghanistan: The Taliban’s stronghold and current theater of America’s longest war. Afghans halted in FY 2011: 106. Prior ten fiscal years: 681.

Nigeria: The land of underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab suffers under sharia law in its northern provinces. Respective data: 591, 4,525.

Pakistan: Hideaway of the Pakistani Taliban and the late Osama bin Laden. 525, 10,682.

Saudi Arabia: Generous benefactor of radical imams and militant mosques worldwide; birthplace of 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers. 123, 986.

Somalia: Home of Indian Ocean pirates and al-Qaeda’s al-Shabaab franchise. In October 1993, Islamic terrorists there shot down two Black Hawk helicopters, killed 18 U.S. soldiers, and dragged several of their bodies through Mogadishu’s streets. 323, 1,524.

(For further details, please peruse the spreadsheet attached here.)

At a Capitol Hill hearing last July, Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano conceded that terrorists enter the U.S. via the U.S./Mexican border “from time to time.”

The House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Oversight last November published A Line in the Sand: Countering Crime, Violence, and Terror at the Southwest Border. As this study explained:

The Congressional Research Service reports that between September 2001 and September 2012, there have been 59 homegrown violent jihadist plots within the United States. Of growing concern and potentially a more violent threat to American citizens is the enhanced ability of Middle East terrorist organizations, aided by their relationships and growing presence in the Western Hemisphere, to exploit the Southwest border to enter the United States undetected.

A Line in the Sand offers chilling portraits of some who treat the southern border as America’s welcome mat.

• On January 11, 2011, U.S. agents discovered Said Jaziri in a car trunk trying to enter near San Diego. Said said that he had traveled from his native Tunisia to Tijuana and paid smugglers $5,000 to sneak him across the border. The French government previously convicted and deported Jaziri for assaulting a Muslim whom he considered insufficiently devout. In 2006, Jaziri advocated killing Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard for creating what Jaziri called sacrilegious drawings of the Prophet Mohammed.

• Somalia’s Ahmed Muhammed Dhakane told authorities in 2011 that he earned up to $75,000 per day smuggling East Africans into America. His clients included three al-Shabaab terrorists. As the House report states: “Dhakane cautioned that each of these individuals is ready to die for their cause and would fight against the United States if the jihad moved from overseas to the U.S. mainland.”

• On June 4, 2010, Anthony Joseph Tracy (a.k.a. Yusuf Noor) was convicted of conspiring to slip aliens into America. Tracy told federal investigators that Cuban diplomats used his travel agency in Kenya — Noor Services Ltd. — to transfer 272 Somalis to Havana. They proceeded to Belize, through Mexico, and then trespassed into the U.S. Tracy, who converted to Islam in prison in the 1990s, claims he refused to assist al-Shabaab. But officials discovered an e-mail in which he casually wrote: “i helped a lot of Somalis and most are good but there are some who are bad and i leave them to ALLAH . . . ”

And just remember: These anecdotes and statistics involve individuals whom authorities intercepted. At a Capitol Hill hearing last July, Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano conceded that terrorists enter the U.S. via the U.S./Mexican border “from time to time.”

Free speech.

Most Americans have never heard of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation).

They’ve never heard of UN Resolution 16/18.

They’re unaware that Europeans have been charged—and even been convicted—for speaking out against the threat of radical Islam.

 

They don’t know that a survey found that 6 in 10 Muslims in America believe criticism of Islam and Muhammad SHOULD BE PROHIBITED.Or that 45% of American Muslims surveyed believe that those who criticize Islam should face criminal charges.

These are not Muslims in Saudi Arabia. They’re our neighbors here in America.


Last night, in a national webcast, we announced “Americans United to Defend Free Speech.”

Guy Rodgers, ACT! for America Executive Director, documented a long list of threats to free speech, which can be seen on our website.

But the most organized threat—UN Resolution 16/18—is actually getting help from our own State Department. (See the Forbes article, “Could You Be a Criminal? US Supports UN Anti-Free Speech Measure.”)

 

A recent headline in a Saudi Gazette article makes it clear how the OIC views UN Resolution 16/18: “OIC gears up to get denigration of religions criminalized.”


There is a rapidly growing chorus demanding the muzzling of free speech, both internationally and in America.

This is why we have launched “Americans United to Defend Free Speech.”

Step One of this effort is our Open Letter to Congress and the State Legislatures.

 


This letter calls on Congress and the state legislatures to introduce and pass resolutions opposing the implementation of UN Resolution 16/18.

Over the next few months, we need tens of thousands of concerned citizens to sign this letter.

Tens of thousands. Hundreds of thousands would be even better.

We need to awaken people everywhere. And we need to show our elected officials that we are dead serious about opposing this threat to our First Amendment right of free speech.

For some time now ACT! for America has been monitoring the growing worldwide demand to suppress speech that supposedly “defames” or “offends” Islam.

This demand to criminalize free speech can no longer be ignored.

We can’t ring the alarm bells loudly enough.

Please don’t assume that the restrictions on speech that exist in Europe or Canada can’t ever happen here.

Join us today for Step One of our campaign to oppose the criminalization of free speech by signing our Open Letter.

Then forward it to everyone you know.

And stay tuned!

Thank you.

 

Net immigration to the UK 250,000 immigrants per year.

Net immigration over the last decade to the UK has been running at over 250,000 immigrants per year. Many of these immigrants are from countries that are outside the EU. Immigration has led to overcrowded schools where often English children are being taught in classes where most of the other pupils have English as a second language. Immigration has meant more houses have to be built on flood plains and has led to worter shortages already. A demographic fact is that immigrants also tend to have more children than English families. What will happen when all these immigrants grow old? – how will the NHS cope?, we already let foreigners fly in and have free treatment. Why is the Government failing to remove all the illegal migrants from the UK. Most Asylum saeekers are just economic migrants who come here because they get free housing and welfare which they don’t get back in their home countries. The international law on refugees says asylum seekers must seek asylum in the first safe country they enter yet we allow them to make claim after claim in the UK until they are sucessful often by citing their right to a family life or human rights etc. Only the lawyers are laughing as they are making a fortune from legal aid defending asylum cases.

We have Irish Pikies stealing metal or fleecing old people out of their savings after doind a dodgy tarmac job on their drives. We have Romanian pickpockets and organised gangs copying credit card details.

Why have we allowed so many Turks to settle in the UK? Why do we allow Pakistanis to go abroad to get a wife – we have plenty of Pakistani’s in the UK. I see a future where there is a civil war in England between the increasing Muslim population and the English. Muslims call for Sharia law if they want this why don’t they go and live under it in Saudi Arabia instead of trying to change the UK. Saudi would not allow Christian churches to be built so why do we allow Mulims to buy out pubs and tunr them into Mosques.

multi-culturism

If I emigrated to Saudi Arabia would thet let me build a Christian church or visit Mecca? Would they let me run a pub or drink alcohol in the street? So why does the UK embrace multi-culturism – we let Muslims buy closed down pubs and convert them into mosques destroying the social meeting places of whole communities. In Saudi Arabia women are not allowed to drive and are put to death for adultery yet men are spared this punishment. We need the world to embrace universal human rights. If people want the UK to be ruled under Sharia law wht don’t they emigrate to Saudi Arabia? Why must we let these bigots live on welfare and cost us a fortune in trying to get rid of the hate preachers. Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada are just two extreme Muslims who have cost UK taxpayers a fortune. Abu Qatada was an illegal immigrant entering the UK on a false passport yet our powers to be won’t send him to face trial for terrorism.